<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jimmy Hoffa found in office refrigerator</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wineandexcrement.com/jimmy-hoffa-found-in-office-refrigerator/1718/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wineandexcrement.com/jimmy-hoffa-found-in-office-refrigerator/1718/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 13:17:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erick Wakley</title>
		<link>http://wineandexcrement.com/jimmy-hoffa-found-in-office-refrigerator/1718/comment-page-1/#comment-707</link>
		<dc:creator>Erick Wakley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 22:24:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wineandexcrement.com/?p=1718#comment-707</guid>
		<description>&quot;It seems as though you completely captivated the proper essence of the situation for the moment.  While numerous appear to have obscured the important idea of it all, that which is put forward previous is clear-thinking plus dead on.  I am not  alleging that I harmonise along every one of the points; yet, you managed to have afforded me reason to think about many of the concepts that I imagined  that I entertained as truehearted notions in that respects.  Substantially stated, and it is now time for my own brain to consider a wee bit more on a couple of the main points.  In summary, I have to think that you have done an excellant job.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It seems as though you completely captivated the proper essence of the situation for the moment.  While numerous appear to have obscured the important idea of it all, that which is put forward previous is clear-thinking plus dead on.  I am not  alleging that I harmonise along every one of the points; yet, you managed to have afforded me reason to think about many of the concepts that I imagined  that I entertained as truehearted notions in that respects.  Substantially stated, and it is now time for my own brain to consider a wee bit more on a couple of the main points.  In summary, I have to think that you have done an excellant job.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
