IRS to assess imputed income tax on breast milk
Posted by on August 4th, 2009 and filed under National News You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback to this entry

WASHINGTON – In an effort to counter a projected 18% decrease in tax revenue this year, the IRS today announced it would be assessing imputed income taxes against breast milk produced and used by nursing mothers.

The projected decrease in tax receipts would be the largest since 1932, when the country was in the throes of the Great Depression, and the IRS has been ratcheting up efforts to reverse the shortfall, especially in light of the record$1.8 trillion federal deficit that is also plaguing the country’s balance sheet.

“Look, we’re giving people free houses, we’re giving them free cars, we’re giving them free cable converter boxes and we’re fixing [sic] to give them free health care on top of all of that,” said Clarified Burden, a spokesperson for the IRS. “When you create a new free ride, you often have to take away somebody’s existing free ride, and nursing mothers quite frankly have been enjoying a free ride for long enough.”

Only days old and already depriving the people of revenue ...

Only days old and already depriving the People of revenue ...

Under the rule changes, which take effect retroactively to the beginning of 1996, breast milk will be classified as “non-cash compensation subject to inclusion in a taxpayer’s taxable wages.” Nursing mothers will have to complete a new form, the TETA series, with their annual filings.

“The logic behind this is simple,” said Burden. “The government allows you to claim your offspring as a deduction, which is fine.”

“But where we run into problems,” he continued, “is when mothers try to double dip. Instead of using that deduction as it was intended – to offset the cost of feeding the child with formula – some mothers will actually breast feed instead, pocketing the difference. That difference is now rightfully subject to income tax. The days of milking the IRS are over.”

Burden said the IRS had concluded that infant formula, on average, costs $1,800 per year, in “round numbers.” Therefore, women who exclusively breast feed will have to declare $1,800 in imputed income, using the TETA28AA form.

Women who claim to only nurse part time and use formula as a supplement and women who claim to not nurse at all will have to complete the long-form TETA46DDD, which consists of 231 pages and requires supplementary photo exhibits, feeding schedules and formula receipts to support the filer’s claims.

Any woman or couple filing jointly with a dependant under the age of six will have to complete the TETA forms.

Since the treasury is so short on cash and since “we’ve overlooked this gaping gap for so long” all women who have given birth since 1995 will have to file retroactive TETA forms, regardless of whether they claim to have used formula exclusively or not, the IRS announced.

“But we’re cutting them a break,” said Burden. “We’re not going to assess late charges if they file by the end of August.”

A spokesman for the Obama administration praised the plan, saying “People should know there’s only one teat that people should suckle – the government’s. Plus, it will create jobs in the formula industry.”

VN:F [1.9.12_1141]
Rating: 8.9/10 (10 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.12_1141]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
IRS to assess imputed income tax on breast milk , 8.9 out of 10 based on 10 ratings

Originally posted 2009-08-04 20:15:43. Republished by Blog Post Promoter

3,473 views

7 Response For
IRS to assess imputed income tax on breast milk



» maria said: { Aug 7, 2009 - 09:08:37 }

this has to be satir
e

VA:F [1.9.12_1141]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
VA:F [1.9.12_1141]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
» Batavia said: { Aug 7, 2009 - 02:08:19 }

“Clarified Burden”……heh

VA:F [1.9.12_1141]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
VA:F [1.9.12_1141]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
» betty said: { Aug 28, 2009 - 04:08:29 }

It’sabout time the government looks at the problems created by these tax cheat mothers and their freeloading babies.

VA:F [1.9.12_1141]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
VA:F [1.9.12_1141]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
» Emgee said: { Aug 13, 2010 - 04:08:06 }

Don’t think this is preposterous. In the early part of last century the south Indian state of Travancore had a tax called Breast Tax. Its level was based on the size of breasts, as size was considered to be an indication of prosperity and capacity to pay tax. Big tax payers used to proudly flaunt their prosperity!

VA:F [1.9.12_1141]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
VA:F [1.9.12_1141]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
» jaynee said: { Sep 16, 2010 - 08:09:47 }

The government should protect the campaign to breast feeding, they should influence the public to motivate mother in breast feeding Ameda Purely Yours Breast Pump as a mother for about two years i encourage my friends to breast their babies for having a good health for their kids…

VA:F [1.9.12_1141]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
VA:F [1.9.12_1141]
Rating: +1 (from 1 vote)
» josephine said: { Sep 16, 2010 - 11:09:58 }

I think breastmilk is a gift from God to every lactating mom. Why should it be taxed? A lot of moms have gone out of their way to work so they can contribute for their family needs. I resorted to breast pumping in order to keep my work and still be a mom. I know the purchase of my Ameda Purely Yours Breast Pump was taxed. Taxes are government resources but is this enough reason to “take the milk away” and let the babies starve?

VA:F [1.9.12_1141]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
VA:F [1.9.12_1141]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)


 

Site Meter